Head to Head Comparison: Solarwindow Technologies (OTCMKTS:WNDW) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI)

Solarwindow Technologies (OTCMKTS:WNDWGet Free Report) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCIGet Free Report) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Solarwindow Technologies has a beta of -8.1, suggesting that its stock price is 910% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Solarwindow Technologies and FTC Solar, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solarwindow Technologies 0 0 0 0 0.00
FTC Solar 1 2 3 0 2.33

FTC Solar has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential upside of 122.02%. Given FTC Solar’s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Solarwindow Technologies.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.4% of FTC Solar shares are held by institutional investors. 67.3% of Solarwindow Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Solarwindow Technologies and FTC Solar’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solarwindow Technologies N/A -42.41% -40.25%
FTC Solar -42.12% -549.96% -37.17%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Solarwindow Technologies and FTC Solar”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Solarwindow Technologies N/A N/A -$2.26 million ($0.03) -10.67
FTC Solar $99.69 million 0.90 -$79.58 million ($5.74) -0.98

Solarwindow Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTC Solar. Solarwindow Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

FTC Solar beats Solarwindow Technologies on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Solarwindow Technologies

(Get Free Report)

SolarWindow Technologies, Inc. engages in the development of transparent electricity-generating coatings and methods under LiquidElectricity Coatings brand. The company's coatings generate electricity by harvesting light energy from natural sun, artificial light, and low, shaded, or reflected light conditions, which is applied to rigid and flexible glass, and plastic surfaces to transform ordinary surfaces into organic photovoltaic devices. The company was incorporated in 1998 and is based in Scottsdale, Arizona.

About FTC Solar

(Get Free Report)

FTC Solar, Inc. engages in the provision of solar tracker systems, software, and engineering services in the United States, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa, South Africa, and Australia. The company offers a self-powered, two-panel in-portrait, and single-axis tracker solution under the Voyager brand name; and a one module-in-portrait solar tracker solution under the Pioneer brand name. Its customers include project developers and solar asset owners, as well as engineering, procurement, and construction contractors that design and build solar energy projects. The company was incorporated in 2017 and is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Receive News & Ratings for Solarwindow Technologies Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Solarwindow Technologies and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.