ECD Automotive Design (NASDAQ:ECDA) & Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) Head to Head Survey

Stellantis (NYSE:STLAGet Free Report) and ECD Automotive Design (NASDAQ:ECDAGet Free Report) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Stellantis and ECD Automotive Design”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Stellantis $173.64 billion 0.12 -$25.31 billion $0.39 13.81
ECD Automotive Design $24.50 million 0.00 -$10.77 million ($53.00) -0.00

ECD Automotive Design has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stellantis. ECD Automotive Design is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stellantis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Stellantis and ECD Automotive Design, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stellantis 6 10 1 2 1.95
ECD Automotive Design 1 0 0 0 1.00

Stellantis currently has a consensus price target of $8.66, suggesting a potential upside of 60.82%. Given Stellantis’ stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Stellantis is more favorable than ECD Automotive Design.

Risk and Volatility

Stellantis has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECD Automotive Design has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Stellantis shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of ECD Automotive Design shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Stellantis shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of ECD Automotive Design shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Stellantis and ECD Automotive Design’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stellantis N/A N/A N/A
ECD Automotive Design -33.06% N/A -52.37%

Summary

Stellantis beats ECD Automotive Design on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Stellantis

(Get Free Report)

Stellantis N.V. engages in the design, engineering, manufacturing, distribution, and sale of automobiles and light commercial vehicles, engines, transmission systems, metallurgical products, mobility services, and production systems worldwide. It provides luxury and premium vehicles; sport utility vehicles; American and European brand vehicles; and parts and services, as well as retail and dealer financing, leasing, and rental services. The company offers its products under the Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, DS, Dodge, Fiat, Jeep, Maserati, Ram, Opel, Lancia, Vauxhall, Peugeot, and Comau brand names through distributors and dealers. Stellantis N.V. was founded in 1899 and is based in Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.

About ECD Automotive Design

(Get Free Report)

ECD Automotive Design, Inc. engages in the production and sale of customized Land Rover vehicles in the United States. The company also provides repair or upgrade services and extended warranties to customers. It restores various vehicles, including Land Rovers Defenders, Land Rover Series IIA and III, the Range Rover Classic, and Jaguar E-Type. The company was founded in 2013 and is based in Kissimmee, Florida.

Receive News & Ratings for Stellantis Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Stellantis and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.