Analyzing FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG)

Share on StockTwits

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FAT) and Chanticleer (NASDAQ:BURG) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for FAT Brands and Chanticleer, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands 0 0 0 0 N/A
Chanticleer 0 0 1 0 3.00

Chanticleer has a consensus target price of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 464.52%. Given Chanticleer’s higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Chanticleer is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Volatility & Risk

FAT Brands has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chanticleer has a beta of 2.46, meaning that its share price is 146% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Chanticleer does not pay a dividend.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.8% of FAT Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Chanticleer shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of FAT Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.8% of Chanticleer shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares FAT Brands and Chanticleer’s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands $18.37 million 2.51 -$1.80 million N/A N/A
Chanticleer $40.61 million 0.06 -$6.85 million ($1.45) -0.43

FAT Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chanticleer.

Profitability

This table compares FAT Brands and Chanticleer’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands -15.35% -46.44% -5.93%
Chanticleer -15.02% -70.24% -17.75%

Summary

Chanticleer beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

About FAT Brands

FAT Brands Inc., a multi-brand franchising company, acquires, markets, and develops fast casual and casual dining restaurant concepts. As of April 22, 2019, it owned 7 restaurant brands, including Fatburger, Buffalo's Cafe, Buffalo's Express, Hurricane Grill & Wings, Yalla Mediterranean, Ponderosa Steakhouse, and Bonanza Steakhouse with approximately 300 locations open and 200 under development worldwide. The company was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Beverly Hills, California. FAT Brands Inc. is a subsidiary of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

About Chanticleer

There is no company description available for Chanticleer Holdings Inc.

Receive News & Ratings for FAT Brands Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for FAT Brands and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.

 


Latest News

Yu Darvish Receives Cortisone Shot for Elbow Impingement
Yu Darvish Receives Cortisone Shot for Elbow Impingement
Red Sox and Brandon Phillips Agree to Minor League Deal
Red Sox and Brandon Phillips Agree to Minor League Deal
Chris Sale Proves He is 2018 AL Cy Young Candidate
Chris Sale Proves He is 2018 AL Cy Young Candidate
Strong Results by Clint Frazier Could Keep Him with Yankees
Strong Results by Clint Frazier Could Keep Him with Yankees
Giants Closer Breaks Hand Punching Door Following Poor Outing
Giants Closer Breaks Hand Punching Door Following Poor Outing
Evan Longoria Out Six to Eight Weeks With Broken Hand
Evan Longoria Out Six to Eight Weeks With Broken Hand


 
© 2006-2019 BBNS.